{"as_of":"2026-07-15T02:19:00Z","canonical_paper_id":"F6F446FR","canonical_url":"https://pith.science/paper/F6F446FR/integrity","context_digest":"sha256:b35225d0a7a8e3ca184814154f4d71e7ca3cb5624e99a159c07d5a2ac2e52530","coverage_summary":[],"findings":[],"findings_empty_copy":"No checks are listed for this paper yet.","findings_observation_state":"no_listed_checks","links":{"arxiv":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.04762","bundle_json":"/pith/F6F446FR6WHLN3QY5AJNM3ZA2V/bundle.json","citation_record":"/paper/F6F446FR/citation-record","evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/F6F446FR/integrity","integrity_json":"/paper/F6F446FR/integrity.json","json":"/paper/F6F446FR/integrity.json","legacy_integrity_json":"/pith/F6F446FR/integrity.json","paper":"/paper/F6F446FR","reference_changes":"/flags?citing=F6F446FR"},"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2010.04762","latest_version":1,"primary_cat":"cs.CL","title":"Counterfactually-Augmented SNLI Training Data Does Not Yield Better Generalization Than Unaugmented Data"},"pith_number":"pith:2020:F6F446FR6WHLN3QY5AJNM3ZA2V","pith_short":"F6F446FR6WHLN3QY5AJNM3ZA2V","record":{"arxiv_id":"2010.04762","claim":"As of an unrecorded date, Pith completed 0 of 0 listed checks against arXiv:2010.04762. No listed check completed, so this record makes no findings claim.","counts":{"completed":0,"failed":0,"listed":0,"not_collected":0,"not_requested":0,"partial":0,"public_findings_from_completed":0,"skipped":0,"unavailable":0,"withheld":0},"coverage":[],"observed_at":null,"refusal":"This is a record of named checks, not a clean-status claim or a paper verdict.","schema":"pith.integrity.v1"},"schema":"pith.paper-integrity-record.v1","species":"LEDGER"}