{"as_of":"2026-07-16T10:17:00Z","canonical_paper_id":"2606.31039","canonical_url":"https://pith.science/paper/2606.31039/integrity","context_digest":"sha256:a94a521f40362f9213941aa124525c4460b4dede04dba2ea5d41eb60fe338800","coverage_summary":[],"findings":[],"findings_empty_copy":"No checks are listed for this paper yet.","findings_observation_state":"no_listed_checks","links":{"arxiv":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31039","bundle_json":"/pith/63FPT3RXPGNTBGJ3CBGSZGTI3Z/bundle.json","citation_record":"/paper/2606.31039/citation-record","evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2606.31039/integrity","integrity_json":"/paper/2606.31039/integrity.json","json":"/paper/2606.31039/integrity.json","legacy_integrity_json":"/pith/2606.31039/integrity.json","paper":"/paper/2606.31039","reference_changes":"/flags?citing=2606.31039"},"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.31039","latest_version":1,"primary_cat":"cs.CL","title":"Truth or Sophistry? LoFa: A Benchmark for LLM Robustness Against Logical Fallacies"},"pith_number":"pith:2026:63FPT3RXPGNTBGJ3CBGSZGTI3Z","pith_short":"63FPT3RXPGNTBGJ3CBGSZGTI3Z","record":{"arxiv_id":"2606.31039","claim":"As of an unrecorded date, Pith completed 0 of 0 listed checks against arXiv:2606.31039. No listed check completed, so this record makes no findings claim.","counts":{"completed":0,"failed":0,"listed":0,"not_collected":0,"not_requested":0,"partial":0,"public_findings_from_completed":0,"skipped":0,"unavailable":0,"withheld":0},"coverage":[],"observed_at":null,"refusal":"This is a record of named checks, not a clean-status claim or a paper verdict.","schema":"pith.integrity.v1"},"schema":"pith.paper-integrity-record.v1","species":"LEDGER"}