{"as_of":"2026-07-21T22:14:00Z","canonical_paper_id":"2010.02114","canonical_url":"https://pith.science/paper/2010.02114/integrity","context_digest":"sha256:db28dfb169b71672b923c2d3b3bff2806c149ea3d8f755a5013847109445f42a","coverage_summary":[],"findings":[],"findings_empty_copy":"No checks are listed for this paper yet.","findings_observation_state":"no_listed_checks","links":{"arxiv":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.02114","bundle_json":"/pith/D2XHR3ZOZWBMMDXWUXEAV4EFUO/bundle.json","citation_record":"/paper/2010.02114/citation-record","evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2010.02114/integrity","integrity_json":"/paper/2010.02114/integrity.json","json":"/paper/2010.02114/integrity.json","legacy_integrity_json":"/pith/2010.02114/integrity.json","paper":"/paper/2010.02114","reference_changes":"/flags?citing=2010.02114"},"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2010.02114","latest_version":4,"primary_cat":"cs.CL","title":"Explaining The Efficacy of Counterfactually Augmented Data"},"pith_number":"pith:2020:D2XHR3ZOZWBMMDXWUXEAV4EFUO","pith_short":"D2XHR3ZOZWBMMDXWUXEAV4EFUO","record":{"arxiv_id":"2010.02114","claim":"As of an unrecorded date, Pith completed 0 of 0 listed checks against arXiv:2010.02114. No listed check completed, so this record makes no findings claim.","counts":{"completed":0,"failed":0,"listed":0,"not_collected":0,"not_requested":0,"partial":0,"public_findings_from_completed":0,"skipped":0,"unavailable":0,"withheld":0},"coverage":[],"observed_at":null,"refusal":"This is a record of named checks, not a clean-status claim or a paper verdict.","schema":"pith.integrity.v1"},"schema":"pith.paper-integrity-record.v1","species":"LEDGER"}